
AI & Healthcare
Borja Edo
5
min read
AI is no longer a novelty—it's everywhere. Investors already use it in daily life, from voice assistants to automated investing, and expect it to enhance financial advising. As AI becomes more powerful, they see the potential for increased efficiency, better insights, and improved decision-making.
But while investors welcome AI’s benefits, they hesitate to trust it completely with their financial future. They worry about accuracy, transparency, bias, compliance, and data security, as well as whether AI will replace human expertise. Advisors who address these concerns head-on can integrate AI effectively while strengthening client trust. Here’s what investors are concerned about—and what advisors can do about it.
1. Data privacy and security
Investors are concerned about how AI systems handle and store sensitive financial data. With increasing cybersecurity threats, there is a risk that client information could be exposed or misused.
What advisors can do:
Choose AI platforms that prioritize encryption and secure data storage.
Use private, on-premise AI models when possible to limit data exposure to third parties.
Conduct regular security audits to ensure AI systems comply with data protection regulations like GDPR and CCPA.
2. Transparency and explainability
Investors want to understand how financial recommendations are made. Many AI models operate as black boxes, meaning their decision-making process is opaque. Lack of explainability can erode trust, as clients may be hesitant to act on advice they don’t fully understand.
What advisors can do:
Use AI tools that provide clear explanations alongside their outputs, ensuring clients understand the reasoning behind recommendations.
Maintain transparency by discussing how AI is used in the advisory process and setting expectations with clients.
Encourage clients to ask questions and offer human-led discussions to interpret AI-generated insights.
3. Regulatory and compliance risks
Financial services are heavily regulated, and AI does not inherently understand SEC, FINRA, or DOL compliance requirements. Investors worry that AI-generated advice may not meet legal standards, leading to potential risks for both clients and advisors.
What advisors can do:
Ensure AI operates within structured compliance frameworks and does not generate advice outside of regulatory guidelines.
Maintain human oversight to review AI-driven insights before they reach clients.
Keep documentation of AI-generated recommendations to demonstrate compliance if needed.
4. Accuracy and AI hallucinations
AI can generate plausible but incorrect or misleading financial insights. Investors worry that relying on flawed AI-driven analysis could result in poor decisions that impact their financial future. Given the high stakes in financial planning, trust in AI’s accuracy is critical.
What advisors can do:
Use AI as a supporting tool rather than a primary decision-maker, ensuring human review of AI-generated insights.
Choose AI solutions trained on high-quality financial data to minimize errors and misinformation.
Implement a fact-checking process to validate AI-generated recommendations before presenting them to clients.
5. Bias in AI-generated recommendations
AI models learn from historical data, which can carry biases. If not addressed, these biases may result in skewed investment recommendations, favoring certain asset classes, demographics, or risk profiles in ways that do not align with a client’s best interests.
What advisors can do:
Work with AI providers that prioritize ethical AI development and actively work to reduce bias in training data.
Regularly audit AI-generated recommendations to detect and correct any patterns of bias.
Keep human oversight in decision-making to ensure AI outputs are aligned with each client’s specific needs and objectives.
6. Loss of human judgment and personalization
While AI can analyze vast amounts of data, it lacks human intuition, emotional intelligence, and personal understanding of a client’s unique circumstances. Investors worry that financial planning will become impersonal or overly reliant on automation.
What advisors can do:
Use AI to enhance, not replace, human expertise by automating routine tasks while keeping client relationships personal.
Ensure AI-generated insights serve as conversation starters rather than final recommendations.
Position AI as a tool to improve efficiency while reinforcing the advisor’s role in guiding financial decisions.
7. Over-reliance on AI and loss of advisor accountability
Investors fear that some advisors may over-delegate decision-making to AI, reducing their accountability for financial outcomes. Clients want reassurance that their advisor is still responsible for their financial plan.
What advisors can do:
Maintain a hands-on approach, using AI for support but ensuring that final decisions are made by the advisor.
Communicate clearly to clients that AI is a tool for enhancing analysis, not a replacement for professional judgment.
Continue to provide personalized guidance that AI cannot replicate, reinforcing the advisor’s value.
How Sherpas Wealth helps
At Sherpas, we’ve built our AI-driven platform with these concerns in mind—balancing automation and efficiency with the advisor’s judgment and expertise. Every AI-generated recommendation is prefaced by diagnostics to provide context, ensuring insights are aligned with the client’s situation. All outputs are drafts for advisors to review and refine before they reach clients, keeping the human element central to decision-making.
Want to see how Sherpas can help you integrate AI seamlessly while maintaining trust and compliance? Book a demo today and explore the possibilities.
RECENT ARTICLES:
SHARE THIS ARTICLE: